2006 Spring Video Roundups, Vol. III
4/14/06
"A Streetcar Named Desire"
Man, this Brando guy was a MONSTER back in
the day, eh? The 1951 classic starring Brando and Vivian Leigh
as a psycho named Blanche was great stuff, but confusing near the
end thanks to that bastard known as censorship; it was so hard for
me to tell what happened when Stanley came home from the hospital to
Blanche while Stella was giving birth to their first child that I
had to read the production notes to learn about what REALLY was
implied by the editing of that sequence. That made the movie
go from great to outstanding for me. Nominated for a
ridiculous 12 Oscars, pretty much everyone in the movie except
Brando won a prize. No matter--it's the anger that Brando
brings to the mix coupled with the over-the-top work of Leigh that
make this one such a firecracker. Good times.
Rating: Opening Weekend
"Stand By Me"
When you see this now, and realize how many
legit stars are in this film, you realize how lucky some casting
directors get when they score a collection of actors that all happen
to get it and all can find a way to launch individual careers.
And then, you get a director in Rob Reiner that had essentially a
top-five run in the 1980s--"The Princess Bride" (many friends think
this is the best film ever), "A Few Good Men", "This is Spinal Tap",
"When Harry Met Sally." And then you get a short story by the
most-bought horror writer ever...that isn't even a horror story.
How "Stand By Me" isn't often talked about as one of the best dramas
that decade is surprising to me, but seeing it now, this is some
great stuff. And I wasn't even a 12-year-old white kid growing
up in 1950s Oregon.
Rating: $9.50 Show
"Primer"
So, four guys build a machine that they think will hold objects
in stasis for X amount of time...but, due to a glitch or maybe their
own genius, it helps them travel back in time roughly 12 hours.
Uhh, what? It's sci-fi at its weirdest by placing a modern-day
time machine in the hands of folks that don't understand its power,
leading me to wonder "WTF?" and the filmmakers to ponder their own
genius for a whopping 75 minutes. This film should have been
better, but as it was, it is just slick-looking for a low budget but
ultimately unfulfilling as an adventure because the questions posed
by the two lead scientists (Shane Carruth and David Sullivan) don't
go much further than "How much money can we make off the stock
market by doing this?" and "What happens if I run into my
time-traveling double while in the present?", which has been
addressed ad infinitum in other movies, from good (the original "The
Time Machine") to bad (uhh..."Timecop"). Good potential,
decent execution, no lasting value.
Rating: Matinee
"Romy and Michele's High School Reunion"
Awful in ways that I can't explain, this 1997 comedy was on one
day, and I started watching it, and like a bad train wreck, I was
the whole damned thing. Wow, this was dogshit--Lisa Kudrow was
as unfunny as I can remember, still-shocking-as-an-Oscar-winner Mira
Sorvino's attempt at going ditz just didn't work, and the supporting
one-note characters from the high school past of the lead twosome
(28-year-olds living in L.A. with shitty jobs and no future) all
suck. Even Janeane Garofalo sucks in this movie. Wow,
fucking fuckity-McFuck Fuck dogshit.
Rating: Hard Vice
Comments? Drop me a line at
justin@bellviewmovies.com.
Bellview Rating System:
"Opening Weekend": This is
the highest rating a movie can receive. Reserved for movies that
exhibit the highest level of acting, plot, character development,
setting...or Salma Hayek. Not necessarily in that order.
"$X.XX Show": This price
changes each year due to the inflation of movie prices; currently,
it is the $9.50 Show. While not technically perfect, this is a
movie that will still entertain you at a very high level.
"Undercover Brother" falls into this category; it's no "Casablanca",
but you'll have a great time watching. The $9.50 Show won't win any
Oscars, but you'll be quoting lines from the thing for ages (see
"Office Space").
"Matinee": An average movie
that merits no more than a $6.50 viewing at your local theater.
Seeing it for less than $9.50 will make you feel a lot better about
yourself. A movie like "Blue Crush" fits this category; you leave
the theater saying "That wasn't too bad...man, did you see that
Lakers game last night?"
"Rental": This rating
indicates a movie that you see in the previews and say to your
friend, "I'll be sure to miss that one." Mostly forgettable, you
couldn't lose too much by going to Hollywood Video and paying $3 to
watch it with your sig other, but you would only do that if the
video store was out of copies of "Ronin." If you can, see this
movie for free. This is what your TV Guide would give "one and a
half stars."
"Hard Vice": This rating is
the bottom of the barrel. A movie that only six other human beings
have witnessed, this is the worst movie I have ever seen. A Shannon
Tweed "thriller," it is so bad as to be funny during almost every
one of its 84 minutes, and includes the worst ending ever put into a
movie. Marginally worse than "Cabin Boy", "The Avengers" or
"Leonard, Part 6", this rating means that you should avoid this
movie at all costs, or no costs, EVEN IF YOU CAN SEE IT FOR FREE!
(Warning: strong profanity will be used in all reviews of "Hard
Vice"-rated movies.)