2002 Spring Video Roundup
4/1/02
A great man once said, "When in doubt, watch
a lot of f***ing movies."
"What Women Want"
I refused to see this film in theaters on
principle, since it was gun-totin' Mel Gibson in a sappy romance
movie. But for free, I'll do most anything, so I finally caught
this film recently and it was pretty damned funny. Mel puts the
Glock away and trades bullets for nail polish as ad exec Nick
Marshall, a chauvinistic pig that bags women like groceries with his
good looks and over-the-top charm. But, when he accidentally
electrocutes himself by dropping a hair dryer into his bathtub, he
recovers being able to read the minds of any woman he wants. This
fantasy-romantic comedy works mostly because Mel looks like he is
having the time of his life. Helen Hunt and Marisa Tomei give great
support and, save for a couple of bad cheese moments, is mostly a
movie that members of both sexes can sit through without much
trouble.
Rating: $9.50 Show
"State and Main"
A couple of my film friends here in San
Francisco recommended that I see this film, since it features a
faux-Hollywood film crew that is shooting a film in small-town
Vermont...or, I guess that would just be Vermont then! David Mamet
("Glengarry Glen Ross", "Heist") directs his own script with
middling results; the film's first hour is pretty funny, with great
references to associate producing credits and hamming it up with
stars William H. Macy, Alec Baldwin and Sarah Jessica Parker. But,
the title refers to the corner of an intersection where a car
accident happens mid-film, and that is where the film starts to roll
downhill badly. You could do worse, but wouldn't you rather do
better?
Rating: Matinee
"Barton Fink"
Trying to catch up on Coen Brothers films
that I haven't seen, I finally saw this 1991 entry starring regulars
John Turturro, John Goodman and Tony Shalhoub about a 1941
screenwriter named Barton Fink (Turturro) that is enlisted by a Los
Angeles production company to write a wrestling film. A funny take
on early Hollywood films and the producers behind them, the movie
builds slowly to an event mid-picture that really notches up the
intensity of the performers through its final act. Turturro is
excellent once again and the creepy Hotel Earle lends for some
memorable hallway shots. The film was up for three Oscars in '92
(including Michael Lerner's role as the head of Capital Pictures)
and is well-shot by Oscar-nominated cinematographer Roger Deakins.
Rating: $9.50 Show
"Naked Lunch"
William Burroughs' book is turned into a
David Cronenberg flick in this 1991 sci-fi fantasy about a 1950s New
York City exterminator (Peter Weller, "Robocop") that starts
hallucinating and believes he is a secret agent that must complete
missions in the Interzone, where people from his personal life start
popping up in random situations that must be seen to be believed.
This film is some pretty weird shit, and figuring it all out was a
combination of "who gives a damn?" and "what the fuck?" that leaves
you to just sit and watch the deadpan Weller try to make sense of it
all. I am sure that the book is much better, even if it is just as
incohesive as this mess; the film is just a bunch of random scenes
that don't seem to create any intrigue whatsoever.
Rating: Rental
"Va Savoir" (Who Knows?)
My friend Heidi and I went to the video
store recently and picked this one up after debating over six or
seven other films that were of interest. Since I rarely go to the
video store (think: DirecTiVo Platinum), this was a real treat for
me a) because I was seeing a movie with another person, which is
getting to be ridiculously rare, and b) because I got to see what
former A-list stars were doing with their straight-to-video career.
Seriously, I was laughing out loud at some of the box art and
captions for some bad-looking B-films. Too bad "Va Savoir", a
French film so boring and so bereft of energy that I fell asleep at
least twice during its 150-minute running time, is not as
interesting. A lighter version of "Your Friends and Neighbors" (the
Neil LaBute drama), "Va Savoir" concerns a couple that finds solace
in separate partners, whose partners fool around with even more
partners. More a collection of scenes than a movie, this film
suffers from unattractive French people, not enough sexual content
given its subject matter (a French film about cheating that only has
"brief nudity"?), and not much continuity in its storyline.
Rating: Rental
"Buena Vista Social Club"
Sure, the soundtrack is unbelievable, but
how is the movie that the album is based on? Not bad. In fact,
where I liked "Calle 54" because it just has essentially a bunch of
music videos, "BVSC" just seems to have lots of story, and not
enough of the full versions of the songs being performed. Don't get
me wrong, the stories of the living members of this Cuban performing
troupe are intriguing at times; I want to find a movie that seems to
have the perfect mix of both and can't seem to find it. The best
part about this film is living vicariously through old people.
Seriously! Sometimes, 92-year-old lead singers, 90-year-old
skirtchasers-cum-guitar players, 68-year-old trumpet players and
70-something crooners seem to be more youthful than some of my
acquaintances. If I'm even alive at 92--doubtful, given my culinary
lifestyle--I hope I'm having this much fun.
Rating: Matinee
"Spanking the Monkey"
Props to my man Stefan “Stefdog” Prelog for
the rec on this one; Jeremy Davies (from "Saving Private Ryan")
stars in this fucked-up yet amusing story from 1994. Davies stars
as Ray, a college kid that comes home for the summer ready to work
at a Washington, DC internship...but, upon arrival, Ray's father
tells him that his mom is sick, so Ray must cancel his internship in
order to play caretaker for a while. Things start off slowly but
mid-film, you get a little twist in the action and things get pretty
intriguing from there. Pretty good stuff, but far from a
pick-me-up, and if you see it you'll know what I mean.
Rating: Matinee
"Bringing Out the Dead"
Martin Scorsese is a genius, right? So,
even genius is sometimes misguided; this Nicolas Cage drama about an
EMP ambulance driver that has a three-day freakout should never have
been made by the man. Still, it isn't bad, with a loaded cast of
character actors that include Ving Rhames and Tom Sizemore and Cage
giving a rare inspired performance these days in-between selling out
in bad action films. Really, I would have no problem with Cage if
he would do action films with a story (like the
continuously-underrated "Face/Off"), but he usually picks bad films
like "Snake Eyes" instead. "Bringing Out the Dead" is certainly
hyped up on speed and whacked-out losers, but it has enough scenes
to make it worthy of a rental.
Rating: Matinee
"Chutney Popcorn"
I remember, when I was dating this Gujarati
girl early last year, she told me that one of her favorite films was
“Chutney Popcorn” but I never got the chance to see it until now.
Well, I’m glad she made the recommendation, because the look and
sound of this production is not too quality but the fresh
storytelling is great! A lesbian, a frigid newlywed sister and
their mom make up the core of this family drama, which revolves
around Reena (writer, director and star Nisha Ganatra) and her
attempts to have a child on behalf of said sister, who is unable to
have children. Ganatra should have stuck to her strengths and
stayed behind the camera, because her performance is easily the
weakest of the six or seven principal characters. But, her handling
of the main relationship between Reena and her girlfriend Lisa (Jill
Hennessy) is great mostly because it comes off as believable; after
seeing “Kissing Jessica Stein”, I am happy to report that there
actually ARE positive portrayals of homosexual relationships in the
media, not only ones driven by hot lesbian or gay sex scenes. Man.
Seriously, though, I liked “Chutney Popcorn” a lot.
Rating: $9.50 Show
Comments? Drop me a line at
justin@bellviewmovies.com.
Bellview Rating System:
"Opening Weekend": This is
the highest rating a movie can receive. Reserved for movies that
exhibit the highest level of acting, plot, character development,
setting...or Salma Hayek. Not necessarily in that order.
"$X.XX Show": This price
changes each year due to the inflation of movie prices; currently,
it is the $9.50 Show. While not technically perfect, this is a
movie that will still entertain you at a very high level.
"Undercover Brother" falls into this category; it's no "Casablanca",
but you'll have a great time watching. The $9.50 Show won't win any
Oscars, but you'll be quoting lines from the thing for ages (see
"Office Space").
"Matinee": An average movie
that merits no more than a $6.50 viewing at your local theater.
Seeing it for less than $9.50 will make you feel a lot better about
yourself. A movie like "Blue Crush" fits this category; you leave
the theater saying "That wasn't too bad...man, did you see that
Lakers game last night?"
"Rental": This rating
indicates a movie that you see in the previews and say to your
friend, "I'll be sure to miss that one." Mostly forgettable, you
couldn't lose too much by going to Hollywood Video and paying $3 to
watch it with your sig other, but you would only do that if the
video store was out of copies of "Ronin." If you can, see this
movie for free. This is what your TV Guide would give "one and a
half stars."
"Hard Vice": This rating is
the bottom of the barrel. A movie that only six other human beings
have witnessed, this is the worst movie I have ever seen. A Shannon
Tweed "thriller," it is so bad as to be funny during almost every
one of its 84 minutes, and includes the worst ending ever put into a
movie. Marginally worse than "Cabin Boy", "The Avengers" or
"Leonard, Part 6", this rating means that you should avoid this
movie at all costs, or no costs, EVEN IF YOU CAN SEE IT FOR FREE!
(Warning: strong profanity will be used in all reviews of "Hard
Vice"-rated movies.)