"Shrek 2"
Directed by Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury and Conrad Vernon.
Written by William Steig, J. David Stem, Joe Stillman and David
N. Weiss.
Starring the voices of Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz and
Antonio Banderas.
Release Year: 2004
Review Date: 5/24/04Folks--
After making a shitload of money over the
weekend--the second-highest gross ever, apparently, for an opening
weekend--"Shrek 2" doesn't have to be good, since it made back its
budget after three days of release. Big sequels like this are
almost always a letdown, so with that in mind, at least "Shrek 2"
doesn't suck "Van
Helsing"-style.
Much like the original
"Shrek", the sequel has many very funny moments measured in with
a story that can really be a drag at times, sometimes going fairly
long distances without a really solid laugh. This time around
our old ogre buddy Shrek (voiced by Mike Myers) has just finished up
his honeymoon with fellow princess-turned-ogre Fiona (Cameron Diaz),
and have returned to their native swampland when they get a request
from Fiona's parents (John Cleese and Julie Andrews) to attend a
celebration in Far Far Away concerning the wedding of Fiona to her
new husband.
Small problem--the parents think that Fiona
has married Prince Charming (Rupert Everett). The Prince, and
his wicked mother, Fairy Godmother (Jennifer Saunders, one of the
stars of "Absolutely Fabulous"), spend the rest of the movie trying
to get rid of Shrek, his old buddy Donkey (Eddie Murphy), and their
new accomplice, a feline hitman named Puss in Boots (Antonio
Banderas), so that Fiona will just have to fall in love with the
Prince, making social life in this marriage MUCH more comfortable.
Making the Fairy Godmother the bad guy, as
well as throwing in the random mix of old fairy tale characters
here, are inspired choices that make the cameos of these characters
a lot of fun. Banderas sounds like he is having a blast
playing his character; his Puss in Boots nearly saved the film for
me a third of the way through, when he makes his first
appearance...man, when Puss goes for the pussycat eyes effect, our
theater lost it. A great soundtrack and just really cool
animation makes "Shrek 2" very watchable throughout, and unlike many
movies this year, the flick makes a great run in its final
half-hour, from the Pinocchio line (as he is turned into a boy
accidentally while falling through the air: "I'm a real
boyyyyyyyyyy!!!") to the giant Stay-Puft Man-style Gingerbread Man
death (slow motion of characters yelling "Noooooooooo!!!" as he
falls to the ground had our theater howling) to the musical number
at the end were all great touches.
But the film takes a while to find its
footing. Once again, I don't understand how the film's writers
made the Donkey character so annoying, but in the first 20 minutes,
I almost wished they would find a way to kill off Donkey so I
wouldn't have to hear the whining any more. Many of the film's
sight gags don't work; I'll admit that the idea of Far Far Away as
an old-school Hollywood is quite funny, but save for a hilarious gag
where patrons at a Starbucks-like coffee shop run from the
store...only to run across the street to the OTHER Starbucks-like
coffee shop in town, these plays on the modern Hollywood didn't
amuse me. The comedy here is more witty than worthy of
guffaws, and that works for some people but not for me. The
4000 children in my screening seemed quite happy though, so for the
kids at least, this thing is a great time.
"Shrek 2" is the kind of flick that I will
watch on NBC in a couple of years if I'm eating dinner near the TV
and I happen to pass by it on the channel surf. By no means is
it a classic, and it isn't as well written as the first film...but,
there really are some funny-ass sequences in this film that are
worth seeing on the big screen. Hey, you've got nine bucks to
burn anyway, don't you?
Rating: Matinee
Comments? Drop me a line at
justin@bellviewmovies.com.
Bellview Rating System:
"Opening Weekend": This is
the highest rating a movie can receive. Reserved for movies that
exhibit the highest level of acting, plot, character development,
setting...or Salma Hayek. Not necessarily in that order.
"$X.XX Show": This price
changes each year due to the inflation of movie prices; currently,
it is the $9.50 Show. While not technically perfect, this is a
movie that will still entertain you at a very high level.
"Undercover Brother" falls into this category; it's no "Casablanca",
but you'll have a great time watching. The $9.50 Show won't win any
Oscars, but you'll be quoting lines from the thing for ages (see
"Office Space").
"Matinee": An average movie
that merits no more than a $6.50 viewing at your local theater.
Seeing it for less than $9.50 will make you feel a lot better about
yourself. A movie like "Blue Crush" fits this category; you leave
the theater saying "That wasn't too bad...man, did you see that
Lakers game last night?"
"Rental": This rating
indicates a movie that you see in the previews and say to your
friend, "I'll be sure to miss that one." Mostly forgettable, you
couldn't lose too much by going to Hollywood Video and paying $3 to
watch it with your sig other, but you would only do that if the
video store was out of copies of "Ronin." If you can, see this
movie for free. This is what your TV Guide would give "one and a
half stars."
"Hard Vice": This rating is
the bottom of the barrel. A movie that only six other human beings
have witnessed, this is the worst movie I have ever seen. A Shannon
Tweed "thriller," it is so bad as to be funny during almost every
one of its 84 minutes, and includes the worst ending ever put into a
movie. Marginally worse than "Cabin Boy", "The Avengers" or
"Leonard, Part 6", this rating means that you should avoid this
movie at all costs, or no costs, EVEN IF YOU CAN SEE IT FOR FREE!
(Warning: strong profanity will be used in all reviews of "Hard
Vice"-rated movies.)