"Anchorman: The Legend of
Ron Burgundy"
Directed by Adam McKay.
Written by Will Ferrell and Adam McKay.
Starring Will Ferrell, Christina Applegate, Paul Rudd and Fred
Willard.
Release Year: 2004
Review Date: 7/11/04Folks--
"Anchorman: The Legend of Ron
Burgundy" had, by far, the funniest trailer of 2004, so that
automatically made me nervous going into it. Could Will
Ferrell carry this thing for a full 90 minutes? Are the shots
in the trailer the best parts of the movie? And, will PG-13
bring down the humor potential of the overall product?
Here's what I do know--once again, Will
Ferrell confirms that he might be better than any other SNL product
since the show's heyday of the early 1980s. He even surpasses
people like Phil Hartman and Chris Farley with his work in
"Anchorman"; there are times where Ferrell is acting out the
stupidest thing imagined and you are laughing your ass off.
This time around he plays Ron Burgundy, five-time news Emmy winner
for broadcasting at Channel 4 in a San Diego of the 1970s, as well
as a constant womanizer and proficient scotch drinker.
("Scotch, scotch, scotch...I love scotch...down, down, down, down in
my belly!") Burgundy is gold in San Diego, but even the
biggest gun in town wants to move up in the world, and just as his
chance is approaching to work for the national affiliate, along
comes Veronica Corningstone (Christina Applegate), an ace reporter
from the east coast that begins work at the station with the same
goals as Burgundy. Even though she is not initially attracted
to Burgundy, a few drinks and a jazz flute performance make her
change her mind, and their relationship drives the couple to even
greater heights...mixed in with the occasional low.
Co-written by Ferrell, the script for
"Anchorman" has many funny moments, but many of those scenes are
driven by what seems to be improvisation by Ferrell and his line
delivery. Just watching Ferrell and his team of newsmen turn
their heads in unison towards the camera while rehearsing promos for
the broadcast will make you laugh uncontrollably; a
15-seconds-too-long scene where Burgundy breaks down in a phone
booth over the loss of a loved one still works, because his
incessant crying is so over-the-top that Ferrell just beats you over
the head with the gag until you, too, are laughing your head off.
As my friend Ross "Born at the Concession Stand" Stephenson said
afterwards, it was hard to see anyone else making Ron Burgundy work
besides Ferrell because of the amount of physical humor; right now,
there's no one working that does that side of things better than he
does. Even shots where Burgundy makes fun of others on set by
just spouting off lines like "You're a dirty rotten whore...and, you
know it" work because of the tone with which Ferrell speaks his
dialogue.
The supporting cast around Ferrell--and, the
half-dozen big cameos later in the film--does good-enough work, but
because of the way the script is written, the actors that were cast
look like they are going through their motions sometimes to just
give us more Ferrell. In that respect, "Anchorman" does feel
more vain than some of Ferrell's other films, but that of course is
the idea since he's been a supporting player for so long in everyone
else's flicks. It's all about Burgundy, so that means we also
have some scenes that fall flat, like during Burgundy's initial
attempts to win over Veronica, or when Burgundy is placing prank
calls in the office; they aren't funny, and these scenes could have
been replaced or reduced to give us more, say, Vince Vaughn, as a
rival evening anchor, or maybe another gag with a collage of past
news events at the station featuring the other guys on the news
team.
Then again...it's those three guys on the
news team, Brick (Steve Carell), Champ (David Koechner) and Brian
(Paul Rudd), that are maybe the worst part about "Anchorman",
because save for Brian--a ladies man that does have a few good lines
sprinkled through the film--the other two guys are one-trick ponies
that really don't add much to the picture. Why weren't funnier
people cast in these roles? Why are these three roles so
poorly written? The running gag of Brick--he's retarded,
according to himself--that he's the dumbest guy in the room gets old
VERY quickly, and he gives us a few nervous laughs mostly because
there's not much else going on sometimes. Even the normally
punchline-happy Fred Willard adds nothing in his role as the
program's producer; I kept waiting for a funny moment to be thrown
in, but it never comes, and this is surprising given Willard's
penchant for providing a boost to other comedies in which he has
appeared.
The soundtrack for "Anchorman" is solid, and
director Adam McKay throws in a couple of random segments to keep
things moving, like an animated bit in the film, a music number
featuring a local jazz group and one of the funniest fight scenes in
years, as the rival news crews engage in gang warfare late in the
movie. Having seen the trailer a bunch of times, I was
disappointed that so many of the sight gags in the trailer didn't
make it into the movie, like that scene where Burgundy has a guitar
on his back while trying to hitch a ride, or when he grabs a fistful
of water only to watch it squirt back out of his hand. I hate
it when they use deleted scenes in the trailer! The outtakes
are a bit disappointing as well, although for some reason
unbeknownst to me, there is a shot from "Smokey and the Bandit"
thrown in that will make most people turn to their buddy and say "WTF?"
All of this is to say that "Anchorman"
really straddled the line for me between Matinee and $9.50
Show...but, Ferrell has some truly great moments in the film that
drive it up a notch. The very ordinary script does have some
good lines, but it relies so heavily on Ferrell's performance that
it's a wonder it doesn't crash mid-film after giving us its premise
of Burgundy as silly, nonsensical womanizer. It's a credit to
him that the film keeps you entertained all the way to its poor
conclusion; if they make a sequel, hopefully they'll put a better
package around its only crown jewel.
Rating: $9.50 Show
Comments? Drop me a line at
justin@bellviewmovies.com.
Bellview Rating System:
"Opening Weekend": This is
the highest rating a movie can receive. Reserved for movies that
exhibit the highest level of acting, plot, character development,
setting...or Salma Hayek. Not necessarily in that order.
"$X.XX Show": This price
changes each year due to the inflation of movie prices; currently,
it is the $9.50 Show. While not technically perfect, this is a
movie that will still entertain you at a very high level.
"Undercover Brother" falls into this category; it's no "Casablanca",
but you'll have a great time watching. The $9.50 Show won't win any
Oscars, but you'll be quoting lines from the thing for ages (see
"Office Space").
"Matinee": An average movie
that merits no more than a $6.50 viewing at your local theater.
Seeing it for less than $9.50 will make you feel a lot better about
yourself. A movie like "Blue Crush" fits this category; you leave
the theater saying "That wasn't too bad...man, did you see that
Lakers game last night?"
"Rental": This rating
indicates a movie that you see in the previews and say to your
friend, "I'll be sure to miss that one." Mostly forgettable, you
couldn't lose too much by going to Hollywood Video and paying $3 to
watch it with your sig other, but you would only do that if the
video store was out of copies of "Ronin." If you can, see this
movie for free. This is what your TV Guide would give "one and a
half stars."
"Hard Vice": This rating is
the bottom of the barrel. A movie that only six other human beings
have witnessed, this is the worst movie I have ever seen. A Shannon
Tweed "thriller," it is so bad as to be funny during almost every
one of its 84 minutes, and includes the worst ending ever put into a
movie. Marginally worse than "Cabin Boy", "The Avengers" or
"Leonard, Part 6", this rating means that you should avoid this
movie at all costs, or no costs, EVEN IF YOU CAN SEE IT FOR FREE!
(Warning: strong profanity will be used in all reviews of "Hard
Vice"-rated movies.)